How to read a failed pre-shipment inspection result, the four routes open to you, what each one costs in time and money, and why the leverage sits in your purchase order rather than in the report.
Read what failed before you read the word failed
A lot can fail on minor findings alone while every critical check passed, and that is a different situation from a safety defect in the first carton opened. Sampling standards classify findings by severity and set separate acceptance numbers for each class, so the first question is which class drove the result and how far past its acceptance number the count went.
- Which class of finding drove the result: critical, major or minor
- How far past the acceptance number the count actually went
- Whether the finding is a specification breach or an unagreed preference
The four routes, and what each one costs
Rework and re-inspection keeps the order but moves the ship date, and the second visit is chargeable work. Taking the conforming portion gets some goods moving while the rest is resolved. Accepting with a concession trades a price reduction for the defect you can live with. Rejecting the lot protects the brand and starts the argument about who pays for what.
- Rework then re-inspect: order kept, date moved, second visit charged
- Partial acceptance: conforming units ship, the rest stays open
- Concession: a written price reduction against a named defect
- Rejection: strongest position, slowest outcome, hardest commercially
Your leverage is in the purchase order, not in the report
An inspection report has no force of its own. It matters because your payment terms and your shipping authorisation are tied to it, and if the purchase order never made that link, a supplier can simply ship anyway and invoice you. This is the single most useful thing to fix before the next order rather than during this one.
- Tie the balance payment to an accepted inspection result, in writing
- State that the lot ships only on your written authorisation
- Name the standard and the acceptance numbers in the order, not in a chat message
Decide in writing, and decide quickly
Goods sitting finished in a factory are consuming somebody's floor space, and the pressure to release them grows daily. A decision recorded in writing within a day or two of the report keeps the sequence clean: what you accepted, what you rejected, what you asked to be reworked, and what happens to the balance payment in each case.
- Answer within one or two working days of the report landing
- State the decision per finding, not as a single yes or no
- Record what happens to the balance payment under each outcome
What an inspection provider can and cannot do here
The evidence is ours to produce; the commercial decision is yours to make. We do not hold your goods, we have no authority to stop or release a shipment, and rework costs are settled between you and the factory under your purchase terms. What we can do is carry the finding to the factory, record what was agreed, and go back and look again.
- We record findings and carry them to the factory; we do not negotiate your rework bill unless the engagement covers it
- We hold no goods and cannot stop a shipment; that authority is yours
- A re-inspection after rework is a new site visit at USD 99 per man-day, and is already inside a full sourcing engagement
What to change before the next order
Most failed inspections trace back to something that was never written down: a tolerance nobody agreed, a colour approved over a phone screen, a packaging requirement that arrived after production started. The cheapest fix happens before the order, in the document that both sides sign.
- Seal and date a reference sample both sides accept
- Write tolerances and acceptance criteria into the order
- Agree the inspection standard and level before production, not after
Authoritative references
Need this applied to your sourcing brief?
Tell us the product, market and decision you need to make. We will confirm whether a scoped sourcing, verification or quality service is suitable.
Start a sourcing brief