Report template
Factory audit report template
Linkora Source publishes its basic factory audit report template in full: the sections, every field name, the severity definitions and the standard statement that closes each report. This is the blank template used on our own audits, not a client report, and no client report is published on this site. A basic audit is one day on site, USD 199 flat.
Updated 8 September 2026
Download the template
This is the blank template, not a client report. No client report is published on this site, and nothing on this page describes an audit we have carried out. Every value below is a field to be filled in on the day. What a finished report contains depends on the questions you set beforehand, the factory, and what the auditor was given access to.
The template, section by section
Twelve sections in this order. There is no overall score and no A-to-D grade anywhere in it: a grade answers whether a factory is good in general, and what a buyer needs to know is whether it can take this particular order. Each section instead ends in one of four verdicts — confirmed, partly confirmed, not confirmed, not seen.
0
Cover and summary
The cover answers the buyer's question before anything else: can this factory make your order, on one of four verdicts — suitable, suitable with conditions, not suitable, or cannot conclude. It also carries the arrival and departure times, because how long the auditor was actually on site is a fact you are entitled to check.
| Field | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Report no. | LS-FA-[YYYYMMDD]-[sequence] |
| Audit type | Basic factory audit, one man-day; stage: initial audit or re-audit |
| Client | The company commissioning the audit |
| Supplier (contracting party) | The entity you would be signing with |
| Factory audited | The plant visited, which is not always the same entity as the supplier |
| Audit location | City, district and address |
| Date, arrival and departure | The date and the times on site |
| Auditor / Reviewed by | Who carried out the audit and who reviewed the report |
| Report date | Within 48 hours of the on-site work finishing |
| Conclusion against your order | Suitable / Suitable with conditions / Not suitable / Cannot conclude |
| In one sentence | One sentence saying what was confirmed, what was not, and what the buyer should do about it |
| Critical findings | A numbered list pointing at section 7. Where there are none, the field reads none |
| Section verdicts | A verdict against each of sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
| Statement | The fixed statement reproduced at the end of this page |
1
Scope and the buyer's questions
An audit is only as useful as the questions it is pointed at. Section 1 records your product, the volume you plan to place, the things that must be true before you commit — numbered Q1 onward and answered one by one in section 9 — and any claim the factory has already made to you that you want checked on site.
| Field | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Product | Category, key processes, materials |
| Planned volume | First order, monthly, annual |
| What must be true before you commit | The buyer's own questions, numbered Q1 onward |
| Claims to check | Capability, records or customers the factory has told the buyer about, one line each |
| Out of scope | Product specification conformity, product certifications such as CE or FCC, defects in any particular batch, social-compliance or environmental judgements, financial and credit rating |
2
Entity and site verification
Section 2 establishes that the company on the contract and the building the auditor stood in are related, which is the single check most often skipped and the one that costs the most when it is wrong. Every line separates what the factory stated from what was seen or independently verified.
| Item | As stated | Seen on site / verification result | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business licence | Name, unified social credit code, date of establishment, legal representative, business scope, registered capital, per the licence | Online verification screenshot against the national enterprise credit publicity system; whether the entity is still active | — |
| Registered / facility / audit address | — | Whether all three are the same place, and an explanation where they are not | — |
| Supplier-factory relationship | Same entity / wholly owned / part owned / capacity contract / cannot be proved | Evidence: gate plate, nameplates, workwear, the legal representative attending, map location | — |
| Is this a production site | — | Whether there is equipment and work in progress matching the product, whether workers know the product, and whether the site looks like offices and a showroom only | — |
| Building tenure | Owned / leased, lease running to [date] / not provided | The document, photographed | — |
| Export qualification | Exports directly / through a trading company / not provided | — | — |
| Payee | Whether the account name matches the contracting entity | Yes / no / not provided | — |
Each line closes with one of four verdicts: confirmed, partly confirmed, not confirmed, or not seen.
3
Factory profile
Section 3 keeps two columns apart on purpose: what the factory said, with its source, and what the auditor saw. Most audit reports merge them, and once merged there is no way for a reader to tell which half of a number came from a filing cabinet and which from a conversation.
| Item | As stated (source) | Seen |
|---|---|---|
| Years established / in category / exporting | — | — |
| Floor area: total / production / warehouse / office | — | Estimated and paced out |
| Buildings and floors | — | — |
| Headcount by function: management / technical / QC / production / other | — | Estimate of people actually at work |
| Shifts and hours | — | — |
| Main products | — | Work in progress and stock seen |
| Main markets and client types | — | Packaging and shipping marks seen |
| Peak and low months | — | — |
| Organisation and your contact | Who runs orders, who runs quality, ability to work in English | — |
Anything marked as stated was provided by the factory and is not independently verified unless the report says it was.
4
Capability against your order
Section 4 reads capacity against your order rather than against the factory's largest customer. The calculation is shown, not asserted: machines multiplied by cycle time and hours, set beside what the factory claims, what it actually shipped last year and how loaded it is now, ending in your volume as a share of the number the auditor calculated.
| Process | Machine | Model | Quantity | Age | Condition (running / idle / broken) | Maintenance record | Photo |
|---|
4.1 precedes this as a written process flow: each step in order, marked in-house or subcontracted, with a photo number.
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed monthly capacity | — | Spoken / document |
| Calculated from machines and shifts | Units x cycle time x hours | The auditor's own calculation |
| Actual output last year | — | Records / spoken |
| Current loading | — | The production schedule, photographed |
| Your volume as a share of calculated capacity | — | — |
| Typical batch and MOQ | — | — |
| Quoted lead time against observed lead time | — | — |
The section closes with a written conclusion: whether the factory can take your volume within your lead time, and on what evidence.
| Equipment | Purpose | Quantity | Calibration certificate (number / expiry) | Photo |
|---|
| Material or component | Source (made in-house / bought in, type of supplier) | Incoming inspection | Notes |
|---|
| Process | Subcontractor (type, distance) | Share | Years working together | Disclosed unprompted | Who controls quality |
|---|
Subcontracting found on site that the factory did not disclose is written up in section 7 as a major or a critical finding. 4.7 then covers sampling and engineering: whether there is a sample room, the sampling lead time, who produces drawings and technical documents, and whether the factory can build to your drawing. The audit does not assess design ability.
5
Quality control
Section 5 asks whether quality control exists in practice, not whether it exists on an organisation chart. For each stage the report records the stated practice, whether records were actually seen and dated, and whether the person doing the checking reports to production or to somebody else.
| Stage | Practice (as stated) | Records seen (date, sample sheet) | Carried out by / independent of production | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incoming inspection (IQC) | — | — | — | — |
| In-process inspection (IPQC) | — | — | — | — |
| Final inspection (FQC) | — | — | — | — |
| Pre-shipment check | — | — | — | — |
| Nonconforming control | Identification, segregation, rework, scrap | — | — | — |
| Retained samples | — | — | — | — |
| Complaint handling | Cases in the past year | — | — | — |
| Work instructions and reference samples | Whether they are visible at the workstation | — | — | — |
| Certificate | Number | Issuing body | Scope | Expiry | Online verification |
|---|
Certificates are recorded, not relied upon: the audit does not conclude from a certificate that a management system is effective. Where the records and what happens on the floor do not match, that difference goes into section 7 as a finding.
6
Site conditions as observed
Section 6 records the state of the place as the auditor found it, with photographs. It is written as observation and nothing more, because a one-day capability audit is not the instrument for deciding whether a factory complies with a labour, safety or environmental standard.
| Item | Observed | Photo |
|---|---|---|
| Housekeeping and material identification | — | — |
| Storage: damp protection, stacking height, first in first out | — | — |
| Aisles and fire exits clear | — | — |
| PPE in use | — | — |
| Workforce observed | Recorded only as adult, present, and an impression of skill; no compliance judgement is made | — |
| Other | — | — |
This section is an observation record. It does not constitute a conformity judgement against any labour, safety or environmental standard.
7
Finding log
Section 7 collects everything that could change your decision, each with evidence attached and each translated into a risk to your order rather than left as a general remark about the factory. The severity definitions are fixed in advance so that severity is not decided by how the day felt.
| Field | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| 7a Signed by factory representative | Job title and date, signed on the printed finding log and photographed |
| 7a Factory comments | The factory's own words |
| # | Severity | Situation | Evidence (photo / document) | Risk to your order | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | Critical / major / minor | — | P-xx | — | — |
- Critical: the licensed entity and the site do not match or the relationship cannot be proved; a core process is subcontracted and was not disclosed; there is no final inspection; the site audited is not a production site. Any critical finding caps the conclusion at cannot conclude.
- Major: capacity is not sufficient for your volume; key equipment is broken or missing; inspection happens without records; a certificate cannot be verified online.
- Minor: everything else observed.
The signature means the finding log was confirmed jointly on site. It does not mean the factory has agreed to correct anything.
8
Not seen and could not be confirmed
Section 8 lists what the audit did not establish, why, and what that does to the conclusion. It is the section other report formats tend not to have, and it is the one that decides whether the rest of the document can be trusted.
| Item | Reason (not opened / not provided / not enough time / not present) | Effect on the conclusion |
|---|
This section may not be empty. One day on site always leaves something uncovered, and a report that leaves this table blank is claiming a coverage it does not have.
9
Conclusion and recommendations
Section 9 answers the buyer's numbered questions one at a time, states the conditions attached to a conditional yes, and says what would trigger a re-audit later. Advice to the factory is separated from advice to the buyer, because they are different documents in effect even when they sit on the same page.
| Field | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Conclusion against your order | As on the cover, with the reasoning set out |
| Answers to Q1... | Each of the buyer's questions answered in turn |
| Conditions | For example a trial order capped in quantity, written confirmation of subcontracted steps before work starts, a pre-shipment inspection |
| For the buyer | Specification and acceptance standard written into the PO; a sealed sample; in-process or pre-shipment inspection; payment stages tied to results |
| For the factory | Tied to the findings |
| When to re-audit | A change of site, of shareholders, of order size, or a core process moving to a subcontractor |
| Buyer decision (recorded) | Filled in afterwards |
10
Photo index
Section 10 fixes what must be photographed rather than leaving it to the day. An overview set is mandatory on every audit, and an evidence set attaches to whatever was found. The index gives each photograph a number and a time, which is what lets a finding elsewhere in the report point at something specific.
| No. | Content | Time |
|---|
- Overview set, always taken: factory gate and nameplate, the original business licence, the online verification screenshot, the map location, the office area, the sample room, an overview of each workshop, the warehouse, the inspection area, the fire exits.
- Evidence set: a close-up and a wide shot for every finding, machine nameplates, sample inspection records, calibration certificates, the production schedule, work in progress, and packaging and shipping marks.
- Faces are not photographed; where that cannot be avoided they are masked. Original EXIF data is kept on file, and GPS data is stripped from any version that leaves us.
11
Documents requested and provided
Section 11 records what was asked for and what came back, including the refusals. A factory that cannot produce a calibration certificate has told you something; so has one that produces every document on the list within an hour.
| Document | Requested in advance | Shown on site | Result (provided / not provided / refused) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business licence | Yes | Yes | — |
| Building ownership or lease | Yes | — | — |
| Organisation chart and headcount | Yes | — | — |
| Machine list | Yes | — | — |
| Production schedule, last three months | — | Yes | — |
| Sample IQC / IPQC / FQC records | — | Yes | — |
| Calibration certificates | — | Yes | — |
| System and product certificates | Yes | Yes | — |
| List of subcontractors | Yes | — | — |
| Complaint records, last twelve months | — | Yes | — |
What this template is not
The limits below are printed in the report itself, not implied. They are also the reason the report is worth reading: a document that claims less is a document you can rely on for the part it does claim.
- This is the blank template. It is not a client report, and no client report is published on this site.
- A basic audit is not a certification, and not an audit under any named quality, social-compliance or environmental scheme.
- The audit does not verify product specifications, product certifications, or any particular production lot. That is what a pre-shipment inspection is for.
- No overall score and no grade is given anywhere in the report. The conclusion is stated against your order, and any critical finding caps it at cannot conclude.
- Section 8, not seen and could not be confirmed, may never be left empty.
- Statements marked as stated were provided by the factory and were not independently verified unless the report says they were.
The statement printed at the end of every audit report
This wording is fixed. It is reproduced here in full because the limits of a one-day audit are part of what you are buying, and a limit you only discover in the report is not much of a limit.
This report records what the auditor saw, was shown and was told at the audit location on the date stated. It reflects conditions at that time and place; a one-day visit is a sample of the operation, and matters not observed may exist. Statements marked “as stated” were provided by the factory and were not independently verified unless the report says so. This is not a certification, not an audit under any named quality, social-compliance or environmental scheme, and not a verification of product specifications, product certifications or any specific production lot. The buyer remains responsible for supplier selection, contract terms and product approval.
Once more, because it matters
Everything above is the blank template we work to. It is not a client report, and no client report is published on this site — a report belongs to the buyer who paid for it, and the factory named in it did not agree to be named on a website. What we can publish is the method, which is the part you are actually buying.
Download the templateRelated
Report structure
Why a report should make the next decision clearer.
Factory audit
One day on site, one auditor, a standard report.
Inspection report template
The other template we work to, published the same way.
Factory audit vs inspection
An audit answers can they; an inspection answers did they.
Supplier verification
The desk check that comes before anyone travels.
Pricing
USD 199 flat for a basic audit, report within 48 hours.
Want this filled in for a factory you are considering?
Send us the factory, your product and the volume you plan to place, together with the questions that have to be answered before you commit. A basic audit is USD 199 flat for one day on site, and the report reaches you within 48 hours of the visit finishing.
Discuss a factory audit